ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISM: Main concepts

By Unknown

“Anarchy is the order of the day among hunter-gatherers. Indeed, critics will ask why a small face-to-face group needs a government anyway. If this is so we can go further and say that since the egalitarian hunting-gathering society is the oldest type of human society and prevailed for the longest period of time – over thousands of decades – then anarchy must be the oldest and one of the most enduring kinds of polity. Ten thousand years ago everyone was an anarchist.”

 

Some anarcho-primitivists state that prior to the advent of agriculture, humans lived in small, nomadic bands which were socially, politically, and economically egalitarian. Being without hierarchy, these bands are sometimes viewed as embodying a form ofanarchism. John Moore writes that anarcho-primitivism seeks “to expose, challenge and abolish all the multiple forms of power that structure the individual, social relations, and interrelations with the natural world.”

Primitivists hold that, following the emergence of agriculture, the growing masses of humanity became evermore beholden to technology (“technoaddiction”) and abstract power structures arising from the division of labor and hierarchy. Primitivists disagree over what degree of horticulture might be present in an anarchist society, with some arguing that permaculture could have a role but others advocating a strictlyhunter-gatherer subsistence.

Primitivism has drawn heavily upon cultural anthropology and archaeology. From the 1960s forward, societies once viewed as “barbaric” were reevaluated by academics, some of whom now hold that early humans lived in relative peace and prosperity. Frank Hole, an early-agriculture specialist, and Kent Flannery, a specialist in Mesoamericancivilization, have noted that, “No group on earth has more leisure time than hunters and gatherers, who spend it primarily on games, conversation and relaxing.” Jared Diamond, in the article “The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”, said hunter-gatherers practice the most successful and longest-lasting life style in human history, in contrast with agriculture, which he described as a “mess” and that it is “unclear whether we can solve it”. Based on evidence that life expectancy has decreased with the adoption of agriculture, the anthropologist Mark Nathan Cohen has called for the need to revise the traditional idea that civilization represents progress in human well-being.

Scholars such as Karl Polanyi and Marshall Sahlins characterized primitive societies as gift economies with “goods valued for their utility or beauty rather than cost; commodities exchanged more on the basis of need than of exchange value; distribution to the society at large without regard to labor that members have invested; labor performed without the idea of a wage in return or individual benefit, indeed largely without the notion of ‘work’ at all.” Other scholars such as Paul Shepard, influenced by anthropologistClaude Lévi-Strauss, have written of the “evolutionary principle”, which states that when a species is removed from its natural habitat, its behaviors will become pathological. Shepard has written at length on ways in which the human species’ natural “ontogeny”, which developed through millions of years of evolution in a foraging mode of existence, has been disrupted due to asedentary lifestyle caused by agriculture

Advertisements

FUTUR BOY VEGAN

Hoping that he doesn’t become perverted by the adult carnist that will ridicule him as he grows

Fishing Without Nets (Short Film)

A story of pirates in Somalia told from the perspective of a struggling, young Somali fisherman. Among other awards, this short film won the Grand Jury Prize in short filmmaking at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival.

THE CONDITION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES are seriously overlook, they can not hunt or fish anymore, they are constantly patronized, the first world sending them aid, if that even happens, their lands are exploited by corporation.

It is so obvious to me that the problem is us, who live in the countries that benefit from the exploitation, rich, middle working class and poor, very few of us truly make an effort to change our consuming habits, and even if we did what would most of us eat? we would have to learn how to grow our own food,and if we are still working to get by, this becomes very difficult to maintain a way of life compatible with the manifested version of western civilizations utopia, there are alternative foods, like locally grown, produced or manufactured foods, but their are also the ones with less money, who rely on mass produced and cheap factory farmed animal flesh and the majority of these consumers are poor therefore a vicious circle of consumption an indirect and direct exploitation committed by consumer and big corporation.